I am not a Tax Lawyer, Nor do I play Dan Evans on the internet.
I am not a Certified Public Accountant, Nor do I play Paul Thomas on the internet.
I am not an Enrolled Agent, Nor do I play Richard Macdonald on the internet.
DO NOT TAKE MY WORD FOR ANYTHING ON THIS PAGE.
Go look it up for yourself.
2 of 6 Questions, AbridgedI was one of 1,200 people who sent six questions to John Snow, Secretary of Treasury and Mark Everson, Commissioner of the IRS. (Not a typo. ONE THOUSAND & TWO HUNDRED)
Anybody that doesn't know a thing about the 861 EVIDENCE can still understand the simple logic of the first two questions. Either I am to use 26 USC § 861(b) and 26 CFR § 1.861-8 to determine my taxable income, or I am not.
Does the following letter look like it was sent by anyone who even read what they were replying to?
Do you see ANYTHING that even begins to answer yes or no to the first question?
Neither do I.
With that informative letter in your mind, check out this exact quote:
Something is incongruous. Something does not fit. Something does not belong in this group.
Which evidence carries more weight?