Post reply

Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.

Note: this post will not display until it's been approved by a moderator.

Name:
Email:
Subject:
Message icon:
Attach:
(Clear Attachment)
(more attachments)
Allowed file types: doc, gif, jpg, mpg, pdf, png, txt, zip, rtf, mp3, webp, odt, html
Restrictions: 4 per post, maximum total size 30000KB, maximum individual size 30000KB
Note that any files attached will not be displayed until approved by a moderator.
Verification:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:

shortcuts: hit alt+s to submit/post or alt+p to preview


Topic Summary

Posted by: Dale Eastman
« on: March 21, 2021, 03:45:27 PM »

Quote
Couldn't care less.
Quote
I certainly don't expect any honesty.
Quote
Quote
Like I said. No honesty. No honor. You made stupid assumptions and made a fool of yourself.
Quote
I asked a simple question about taxes. You saw what you wanted to see in the question...And boy oh boy....you had found yourself a "statist." You just couldn't WAIT to rip into that fool. In your zeal, you didn't realize whom you were talking to. All you saw was an opportunity to spear that fool. .....As far as the Marx thing.....I STILL have no idea where you came up with that. All this doesn't make you a criminal.....your zeal got the best of you and you...welll...looked foolish.
Quote
Posted by: Dale Eastman
« on: March 21, 2021, 03:30:25 PM »

Quote
More cowardly avoidance. You aren't fooling anybody.
Quote
You are worming and squirming, Dale........For all to see.
Quote
Turn's out that you are just a silly, play-acting little boy trying to sound important.
Quote
Exactly what kind of reaction are you hoping to get from me?
Posted by: Dale Eastman
« on: March 21, 2021, 03:01:14 PM »

Quote
Cowardly. Please address my last statement.
Quote
I have not denied A SINGLE comment I have made. I will not, in the future deny A SINGLE comment. Please show the comments I made expressing

1. That I am in favor of taxes.

2. Any comment that "identifies myself as a 'Marxist.'"
Quote
Already asked and answered.

➽ And in reality anything that the public seems a necessity will still be funded in a voluntary basis" is ludicrous.

So if things the public deems a necessity won't be funded on a voluntary basis, how will it be funded?

➽ For wage laborers you forgot about the theft that took place BEFORE you received the money [...]

What, specifically, is the theft to which you infer?
Quote
Are you there, Dale. You have everything "archived"...this should be easy for you....Unless you realized you made some high school intelligence level assumptions that were erroneous. That might make some people try to worm and squirm their way out of such embarrassment. But not a person of honor, like Dale.
Quote
I love when cognitive giants call me by their maiden names.
Posted by: Dale Eastman
« on: March 21, 2021, 02:34:42 PM »

Quote
Anyone who says all society's needs will be furnished on a voluntary basis is not rational. That method might be better than the government's efforts, but it still not rational. Look around. The government's efforts have been hopelessly inadequate. But to say these needs will be met by volunteers is ridiculous.
Quote
I NEVER IMPLIED that TAXES were NEEDED. You are just not a very bright person. The idea that an anarchist would favor taxes is absurd. To whon would these taxes be paid. I take back my inference that you are dishonest. I attributed some of your statements as dishonest because I didn't think you could be that stupid.
Quote
And in reality anything that the public seems a necessity will still be funded in a voluntary basis" is ludicrous.
Quote
Next stupid assumption by you (the 1st one was when you assumed that disparaging volunteerism meant that I favored government intervention).........you next stupid assumption was expressed in your statement............."You have just identified yourself to me as a Marxist."............How and when did I identify myself as a Marxist?
Quote
Please explain how I identified myself as a Marxist. If you do, you can complete the process of making a fool out of yourself.

1. First, I asked a simple question about taxes and you interpreted that as me saying I was in favor of taxes. Imagine, an anarchist being in favor of taxes. To whom would these taxes be paid.

2. You said that "I had identified myself as being a Marxist."....I have never read a SINGLE WRD written by Karl Marx. I haveread enough about him to believe one of his crucial beliefs is laughably absurd. So...if you can tell me how I "identified myself as a Marxist"....you will have completed the task of making a total fool of yourself.
Quote
You might want to review our discussion.

I've publicly archived it here:
synapticsparks DOT info/dialog/index.php?topic=856
Posted by: Dale Eastman
« on: March 21, 2021, 12:45:19 PM »

Quote
Either way.....how does the statement in question, the one that you reposted...........make me a statist?...........Remember...YOU mentioned honesty. I have asked you this at least 3 times.
Quote
You are starting to look bad.
Quote
Glad to see you have the Gish Gallop perfected.

Okay. I'll merge your TWO topics here.

From the other thread:

➽ [...] And in reality anything that the public seems a necessity will still be funded in a voluntary basis" is ludicrous. [...]

⇉ Please explain why I am in error in parsing those words of yours as a statist's words?

To which you attempted D⁴ - Distract, deflect, divert, and disrupt when you asked:
➽ When did I say that?

I provided proof after jumping through your hoops of continued attempted D⁴. Said BS archived here: synapticsparks DOT info/dialog/index.php?topic=854.msg15131#msg15131

Then you said:
➽ I remember saying that. I still say it. What is your point?

Then ignoring my previous inquiry you asked:
➽ How does that make me a "statist?"

You, when you implied that taxes are needed when you wrote this:
➽ And in reality anything that the public seems a necessity will still be funded in a voluntary basis" is ludicrous.

That's how.

====================================

➽ When have I ever said I was a Marxist?

When you wrote, and I quote:
➽ For wage laborers you forgot about the theft that took place BEFORE you received the money [...]
Posted by: Dale Eastman
« on: March 21, 2021, 12:06:01 PM »

Quote
Cowardly answer. I see my statement. I remember my statement. AND...I STILL say the same thing. How does that make me a statist?
Quote
Are you there???
Quote
You are just a bit confused. In this thread I called you a Marxist. It's in the other thread where I called you a Statist.

Would you like to merge them on my status wall?
Posted by: Dale Eastman
« on: March 21, 2021, 11:54:20 AM »

In an ongoing discussion, this was presented:
Quote
Quote
For wage laborers you forgot about the theft that took place BEFORE you received the money that would go through this parade of taxes.
Quote
You have just identified yourself to me as a Marxist. I can not say with any honesty that I understand what I view as confusion on the part of Marxists. Thus, I am actually curious as to what you think and why.
Quote
More nonsense. When have I ever said I was a Marxist? I have never read a single word by Karl Marx. I have, however, read a lot about what Marx said. One of major tenets is, to me, the height of absurdity............Again, please copy and paste the comment you claimed I have made.
Quote
Are you there?
Quote
Reading challenged eh?