Post reply

Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.

Note: this post will not display until it's been approved by a moderator.

Name:
Email:
Subject:
Message icon:

Attach:
(Clear Attachment)
(more attachments)
Allowed file types: doc, gif, jpg, mpg, pdf, png, txt, zip, rtf, mp3, webp, odt, html
Restrictions: 4 per post, maximum total size 30000KB, maximum individual size 30000KB
Note that any files attached will not be displayed until approved by a moderator.
Verification:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:

shortcuts: hit alt+s to submit/post or alt+p to preview


Topic Summary

Posted by: Dale Eastman
« on: November 05, 2021, 08:51:38 AM »

30 OCT 2021
Liberty or Slavery?
Do you want to be a slave?

I shouldn't need to ask this question, yet I must because of the repercussions, often hidden, of people not examining this question. I ask this question because it sets the foundation on what I have concluded is an absolute, non-relative moral boundary.

I base this absolute morality on a simple premise: If I don't want any specific harm done to me, any person attempting to do that specific harm to me is acting immorally.

If I don't want harm done to me, then it is immoral for me to do harm to any other human. I use slavery as an example of harm initiated against other humans. Anybody that attempts to enslave other humans is a criminal intending to harm others.

I have had discussions with people who believe that an action is not criminal if there is no law against the action that causes that specific harm. Using that logic, humans enslaving humans is not a criminal act. However humans enslaving humans IS a criminal act according to Natural Law as expressed by John Locke in his Second Treatise of Government. Enslavement is a crime against humanity. King George and Adolf Hitler were Natural Law criminals.