Post reply

Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.

Note: this post will not display until it's been approved by a moderator.

Name:
Email:
Subject:
Message icon:
Attach:
(Clear Attachment)
(more attachments)
Allowed file types: doc, gif, jpg, mpg, pdf, png, txt, zip, rtf, mp3, webp, odt, html
Restrictions: 4 per post, maximum total size 30000KB, maximum individual size 30000KB
Note that any files attached will not be displayed until approved by a moderator.
Verification:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:

shortcuts: hit alt+s to submit/post or alt+p to preview


Topic Summary

Posted by: Dale Eastman
« on: December 26, 2022, 02:08:13 PM »

Quote from: 26 1507
➽ the wheedly little semantic jerkoff that you are.

Why are you calling me by your maiden name? ... Again?

➽ you're comparing paying taxes, a normal part of human society since ancient times, with slavery, the literal ownership of another person.

If you are not 100% free of your owner's demands on your life, liberty, or property, then you are a slave.
Agree? Disagree? Why?
Quote from: 28 1037
Hey wheedly little semantic jerkoff

I asked you a question.

If you are not 100% free of your owner's demands on your life, liberty, or property, then you are a slave.
Agree? Disagree? Why?
Quote from: 28 1433
disagree, you whiny little milksop. The condition you describe has not ever existed in nature. You have an impossible ideal.
Quote from: 28 1618
Let me make sure I understand your position.

You disagree that a human is a slave if they are not 100% free of their owner's demands on their life, liberty, or property.

Your words were:
➽ [Slavery] would be a state wherein an actor has complete and total legal control over the existence of another human being

Are you claiming that only being 1% enslaved is not being enslaved?
Quote from: 31 1145
Let me make sure I understand your position.

You disagree that a human is a slave if they are not 100% free of their owner's demands on their life, liberty, or property.

Your words were:
➽ [Slavery] would be a state wherein an actor has complete and total legal control over the existence of another human being

Are you claiming that only being 1% enslaved is not being enslaved?
You are claiming I have the impossible ideal that when someone's life, liberty, or property are controlled by another against their will, they are enslaved?

https://www.facebook.com/awakenwithjp/posts/pfbid05bSRMekgE4W4Avmf7GL5cvQsNdWc3CAavY2JQro78B1FjQWAPydndTPG5dbJ7PP2l?comment_id=640977504443207&reply_comment_id=888668408926379
Posted by: Dale Eastman
« on: December 26, 2022, 01:42:36 PM »

Quote from: 21 1608
Liberty or Slavery

If you are an anti-gun coward...
Try to understand:

A human with a gun will not gently become a slave.

synapticsparks.info
Quote from: 25 1145
hey bud you want to point to the people that will, in fact, gently become a slave?
Quote from: 26 0937
➽ hey bud you want to point to the people that will, in fact, gently become a slave?

If you have ever filled out a Form W9, Form W4, Form 1040, or gone to a public school... Look in the mirror.

If you would be so kind as to explain to me why you have an issue with what I wrote??
Quote from: 26 1153
uhhh sure. Try and enslave me buddy. I went to public school and I pay my taxes. Bring your little tyranny schtick and you find out what fun tricks a drone pilot can do.
Quote from: 26 1313
What we obviously have here, is a failure to communicate. This is on me because you don't understand what I am presenting.

➽ I went to public school and I pay my taxes.

In writing that, you have admitted to gently becoming a slave.

What do I mean with the word "slave"?
What do you understand when you read the word "slave"?
Quote from: 26 1318
you're presenting weird formatting and weak fucking arguments, hoss. You didn't address what I mentioned, you just pulled the coward move of "Oho, clearly I am too smart for you". Man the fuck up and address the issue.
Quote
➽ Man the fuck up and address the issue.

You're a slave brainwashed into believing you are not a slave.

Second inquiry:
What do I mean with the word "slave"?
What do you understand when you read the word "slave"?
Quote from: 26 1329
oh look, it's the guy who spends all their time arguing semantics. Slavery is a pretty fucking specific state. The stuff you're talking about is actually "normal things people do in a normal society".
Quote from: 26 1347
➽ Slavery is a pretty fucking specific state.

And in your mind that is?

I can't read your mind. I do not ass u me it means the same to each of us.

Third inquiry:
What do you understand when you read the word "slave"?
Quote from: 26 1348
ok little man, since you're apparently incapable of reading a fucking dictionary, that would be a state wherein an actor has complete and total legal control over the existence of another human being and this state is unquestioned by society.
Quote from: 26 1349
your writing is fucking cringeworthy dude. You're ben shapiro without the charm or knowledge of vaginas.
Quote from: 26 1354
➽ since you're apparently incapable of reading a fucking dictionary,

A fucking dictionary does NOT tell me what YOU believe, does it. <no question mark. rhetorical question.

So... Gasorminumplaz.
Quote from: 26 1355
way to go big derp, I literally answered your fucking question and you ignored it to argue MORE about semantics. You're useless.
Quote
➽ I literally answered your fucking question and you ignored it to argue MORE about semantics. You're useless.

There's a difference between ignoring something and addressing it at a later time.

Your animosity at me... Name call all you want. That makes no difference to me. And that IS being ignored by me.

So here I am, finding that you have no knowledge of Voltaire's admonition: If you want to communicate, define your terms. You ignored Gasorminumplaz, so you MUST already ass u me you know its definition. Or you just ignored it. Which means you are calling me by your maiden name.

Getting back to this defining of terms... I will NOT allow equivocation be it deliberate or lazy thinking.

You and I have NOT come to an agreement as to what a "slave" is... Even though I claimed that is what you are.

You have claimed that a slave is a human in

➽ a state wherein an actor has complete and total legal control over the existence of another human being and this state is unquestioned by society.

I am assuming that is a copy-paste from a dictionary. If so, that dictionary is wrong.

Such an unquestioning society is an immoral society.

Are you part of such an unquestioning society?
What is the difference in "total legal control" and "total control" the law notwithstanding?
Quote from: 26 1423
bud, you're comparing paying taxes, a normal part of human society since ancient times, with slavery, the literal ownership of another person. You're in a completely different space of reality from what normal people think of as slavery, and being entirely hyperbolic about it.
Quote from: 26 1425
as for the animosity, it's because I don't give a singular fuck about your sad little rules of engagement as defined by a dead Frenchman. The moment they aren't convenient to your argument, I presume you pick different rules and argue like the wheedly little semantic jerkoff that you are.