Post reply

Note: this post will not display until it's been approved by a moderator.

Name:
Email:
Subject:
Message icon:
Attach:
(Clear Attachment)
(more attachments)
Allowed file types: doc, gif, jpg, mpg, pdf, png, txt, zip, rtf, mp3, webp, odt, html
Restrictions: 4 per post, maximum total size 30000KB, maximum individual size 30000KB
Note that any files attached will not be displayed until approved by a moderator.
Verification:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:

shortcuts: hit alt+s to submit/post or alt+p to preview


Topic Summary

Posted by: Dale Eastman
« on: February 13, 2023, 09:00:09 AM »

➽ So it shouldn’t be a shock we allow

Who the F is this "we"?
Stand up and be known as a unique single individual.
You and I are NOT "we".
You and I are NOT "We the people" long dead.
You and I are NOT "We the people" not dead.
If alive, the writers of the CONstitution could not prove they were actually authorized by the millions of individuals then alive with millions of notarized delegations of authority to speak for any of the millions then alive.
Nobody has been delegated any authority to presume to speak for this collection of individuals, dead or alive. Nobody.
I've just explained why assuming to speak for "we" anywhere at anytime is an irritation for me.