Posted by: Dale Eastman
« on: January 20, 2024, 04:32:28 PM »
Hey IRS... You're part of government, right?
I DEMAND to know where the certified copies of my alleged consent,
with my signature on the consent form is being stored.
I DEMAND to know where the certified copies of the terms
I allegedly agreed to are being stored.
I DEMAND proof of this alleged consent
to be governed, ruled, or owned
be presented IMMEDIATELY.
Failure to do so immediately is government's testimony,
and my evidence, that this alleged consent does not exist.
synapticsparks.info
Dale Eastman when is consent needed for taxation?
My apology. I do not know what your ideology is in regard to government and its enslavement. Sorry.
Dale Eastman Proof of enslavement? Sorry, so many younglings misusing that word, I have to check and see if you're relying on feelings or facts
If you're in the territorial boundaries, they have jurisdiction to enforce their laws. Don't like it? Revolt
Thank you for confirming what I only suspected.
Kudos that you actually asked an inquiry question:
"Proof of enslavement?"
I am going to answer your question with my own question to check if YOU are relying on feelings or facts, as well as determine if you wish to refuse to admit to the accuracy of this definition of slavery (enslavement).
The definition:
A slave is a human whose owner's free will overrides the slave's free will.
Admit or Deny?
I also have questions to clarify your claim about "jurisdiction"... Later.
Dale Eastman I see you failed to cite your definition. So far, you seem to be relying on emotion. You're the only one being audited here.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/slavery
Do you fall under the defined description, citizen?
I see you don't know how to read.
Those words you failed to read:
A slave is a human whose owner's free will overrides the slave's free will.
Admit or Deny?
Dale Eastman I see you're projecting already. The reference is there for you to read/use.
Your subjective understanding is irrelevant. You may refer to facts/legal definitions.
Do you fall under the described conditions, citizen?
Was your last reply an admission or a denial?
Dale Eastman Your lack.of response can be taken as an inability to comprehend the term "slavery". Do you not fall under the described conditions?
You asked these questions:
"Proof of enslavement?"
"Do you fall under the defined description?"
"Do you not fall under the described conditions?"
I asked you to Admit or Deny the definition I provided.
You have deliberately NOT addressed that definition I provided.
You have deliberately concisely NOT Denied the provided definition.
This is an act of EQUIVOCATION: an ambiguous or deliberately evasive statement.
As I review your words I see you attempting to red herring the discussion away from my presented definition.
My presented definition addresses a specific trait, property, attribute, characteristic, element & condition of being a slave. A slave is a human whose owner's free will overrides the slave's free will.
You can NOT deny this.
Your dishonesty is going to end this discussion quite soon. I have had many interactions with others just as dishonest as you are proving yourself to be.
Note to self: Topic change regarding my suspicion regarding this person's ideology?
Dale Eastman Mmm denied.
So you admit you aren't under enslavement, or facing any form of slavery.
At least you kinda tried?
Guess lying to yourself failed like all the others. Victim mongering seems to be a very inefficient means of getting sympathy, you won't find any here, citizen.
Guess you can't prove any alleged theft.
https://www.synapticsparks.info/dialog/index.php?topic=1697.0
Dale Eastman Is your consent at all needed or relevant for taxation?
Are you aware of these words and where they come from:
That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed?
If you know these words then you know why my consent is needed.
Dale Eastman Incorrect, your misinterpretations are moot.
Where in fine print does it state taxation requires consent?
If a person is publicly posting their words they want to convey an opinion, a fact, an observation, a feeling, a belief, or even something a little more complex like an Ideology.
Or they just want to be an asshole troll for the purpose of annoying others.
Sometimes the intent is not immediately discernible.
At this time I do not know if you are trying to be a camouflaged subtle troll or if you have some other idea (ideology) you wish to present.
What is your purpose in replying to my post in the first place?
What do you actually want to make humans aware of?
Dale Eastman You failed to show how consent is relevant or at all needed for taxation.
You're still ruled, and will continue to be ruled, without individual consent, as you voluntarily reside in a body politic with laws.
You're welcome for the clarification.
I saw your disrespectful laugh reacts. Your unwillingness to engage in respectful dialog means you're blocked you government school brainwashed stupid fuck.
=\
