Governments are the biggest mistake humans ever made.
Case and point, mother fk said "Amen and Awomen".
Government = that fking idiot Emanuel for a ruler.
Lead yourself.
Own yourself.
YOU are paying taxes as well. YOU, by your own admission, work 363 days a year to line the pockets of those psychopaths. I don't disagree with everything you say, but you do nothing more than pay lip service to your beliefs. Word salads change nothing, and that appears to be all that you have. 🤷♀️
I've read some of this MC's posts elsewhere. So I believe I know where he's coming from.
I'm a noob here, so I don't understand where you are coming from, Nor the point you are attempting to present.
Would you be so kind as to clarify your intent for me?
which part do you struggle with? I've asked him numerous times what his solution to bloated government is. His only suggestion was to ignore them until they go away. If I have cancer, and I ignore it...will it just go away? No, and neither will government.
Don't fund them was another suggestion. What happens when you stop paying taxes? Will they just leave you alone and go away?
You can complain until the cows come home. It changes nothing. Is that enough clarification?
Thank you for that.
It actually confuses me more though.
I'm trying to get a read on what your thinking is.
What I wrote was: "I don't understand where you are coming from, Nor the point you are attempting to present."
I still don't understand where you are coming from.
So I'll have to ask straight out, Do you think government is good?
Do you believe the myth of 'government'?
Do you believe the U.S. government is benign, trustworthy, law abiding, just, fair, moral, omniscient, and magnanimous; That it will protect our Life, Liberty, and Property; That it will also protect us from chaos, terrorists, dictators, tyrants, criminals, and things that go thump in the night; That it has the consent of the governed; And; That it is morally superior to all others, in form and in action?
I'm asking what his solution is. I'm not sure why you are so confused by that.
Thank you.
Do you agree that there is a problem?
do you have a solution?
I have several ideas for solutions.
After a problem is recognized, the problem must be understood or solutions will have unintended consequences that don't fix the problem, or worse, exacerbate the problem.
You have not answered my question:
Do you agree that there is a problem?
Why do you not answer?
- because I don't answer to you, honey, and all you have provided is another word salad. 🤷♀️
- Has repeatedly brought nothing to the table.
The coward will not say a word about what the coward believes in.
But the coward proves they love tyrant govs because all Mazie Kirk does is slander people for gov.
.....all the while you work like a slave to pay taxes and line the pockets of people you hate. 🤷♀️
Reasonable = no more tyrant govs.
It's that simple coward and you've been told countless times.
It's now time for you, the traitor, to justify your support for enslavement.
It is now time for YOU, a colossal big mouth, to tell us how to get rid of tyrant governments who are enslaving us. I've asked you numerous times how we go about changing things. You have no answers. None.
I just told you I was for LIMITED GOVERNMENT. I don't need to justify anything to you. 😉
➽ - because I don't answer to you, honey,
Good for you, you anarchist you.
Really. Seriously! Good for you.
BUT...
I do NOT have to allow the fallacy of equivocation stand unchallenged.
I ask questions to drill down on equivocations stated by those who have not fully cogitated their own presentation of their own thoughts.
➽ and all you have provided is another word salad.
With that dismissive, disrespectful refusal to attempt to communicate begging for a response in like kind:
Of course it's a word salad to somebody who doesn't understand that words have meaning; that words sometimes have more than one meaning; and that combinations of words are often used to convey complicated concepts.
Especially if the concepts challenge your beliefs by asking you specific questions about your beliefs.
And yet, in spite of your word salad multiple posts, you answered one of my not yet asked questions when you wrote: ➽ I just told you I was for LIMITED GOVERNMENT.
So thinking about your admission that you are for "LIMITED GOVERNMENT" in view of the question you refused to answer, means the only problem you have admitted by implication, is that "GOVERNMENT" is not limited.
Have I correctly grokked your position?
