0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.
Dale: LOL, "immoral statist cretins"... a sure sign you have run out of things to say. But that happened weeks ago, didn't it? It takes you a full day each time to scrounge up some sort of talking point to make your case. And even then, you simply fall back to repeating yourself. The cognitive dissonance must be crippling. And why would Trudeau need my help? You should jump on their Zello and listen in. Like all conspiracy theorists, you just have to let them do their thing, and they'll eventually implode on their own. It's free entertainment, much like you.
Oh, Dale Eastman... the human broken record. 🤡
Didn't you have to help Trudeau with all those conspiracy theorist truckers converging on Ottawa?https://youtu.be/rvqWV61VV9U
What, specifically, is the is the central point?
Quote from: 1836 4 Jan➽ Nobody is being forced against their will to be vaccinated.Quote from: 1734 6 Jan 2022➽ You'd think if everyone really was forced to be vaccinated, the only people not vaccinated now would be off the grid and in hiding somewhere. But they're not, so the only logical conclusion must be that the vaccinations are not forced."Support pours in for Canadian truckers protesting Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's COVID-19 vaccine mandate (FOX NEWS DIGITAL)"https://www.foxnews.com/world/gofundme-freezes-canadian-freedom-convoy-page-after-it-raises-10mYou were spewing?
Dale: "Didn't you have to help Trudeau with all those conspiracy theorist truckers converging on Ottawa?"You have a bad habit of repeating questions (even rhetorical ones) that have already been addressed. Perhaps if you stopped acting in such a childish manner, you'd actually experience what a productive discussion is like?"You were spewing?"What was I spewing? As I said, nobody is being forced against their will to be vaccinated. But then you inexplicably posted a Fox News link about GoFundMe freezing a fundraiser. Does one have anything to do with the latter? Since you are such a fan of Latin phrases, are you familiar with "non sequitur"? Because that's what this is. One does not (logically) follow the other. Perhaps you can explain how GoFundMe's decision is proof that people are being forced to vaccinate?
Quote from: 1836 4 Jan➽ Nobody is being forced against their will to be vaccinated.Quote from: 1734 6 Jan 2022➽ You'd think if everyone really was forced to be vaccinated, the only people not vaccinated now would be off the grid and in hiding somewhere. But they're not, so the only logical conclusion must be that the vaccinations are not forced."Support pours in for Canadian truckers protesting Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's COVID-19 vaccine mandate (FOX NEWS DIGITAL)"So you don't know how cites work? Okay. I've omitted the cite where the paragraph just above was copied from.Nobody is being forced against their will to be vaccinated.Canadian truckers protesting Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's COVID-19 vaccine mandateNobody is being forced against their will to be vaccinated.Canadian truckers protesting Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's COVID-19 vaccine mandateNobody is being forced against their will to be vaccinated.Canadian truckers protesting Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's COVID-19 vaccine mandateNobody is being forced against their will to be vaccinated.Canadian truckers protesting Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's COVID-19 vaccine mandateNobody is being forced against their will to be vaccinated.Canadian truckers protesting Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's COVID-19 vaccine mandateNobody is being forced against their will to be vaccinated.Canadian truckers protesting Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's COVID-19 vaccine mandateNobody is being forced against their will to be vaccinated.Canadian truckers protesting Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's COVID-19 vaccine mandateNobody is being forced against their will to be vaccinated.Canadian truckers protesting Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's COVID-19 vaccine mandateNobody is being forced against their will to be vaccinated.Canadian truckers protesting Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's COVID-19 vaccine mandateNobody is being forced against their will to be vaccinated.Canadian truckers protesting Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's COVID-19 vaccine mandateNobody is being forced against their will to be vaccinated.Canadian truckers protesting Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's COVID-19 vaccine mandateNobody is being forced against their will to be vaccinated.Canadian truckers protesting Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's COVID-19 vaccine mandateNobody is being forced against their will to be vaccinated.Canadian truckers protesting Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's COVID-19 vaccine mandateNobody is being forced against their will to be vaccinated.Canadian truckers protesting Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's COVID-19 vaccine mandateNobody is being forced against their will to be vaccinated.Canadian truckers protesting Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's COVID-19 vaccine mandateNobody is being forced against their will to be vaccinated.Canadian truckers protesting Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's COVID-19 vaccine mandate
Dale: You really love to prove me right, don't you? 😂 And yet despite that wall of repetitive text, you not once provided any supporting evidence of anyone being forced to vaccinate. Protesting something does not mean they are being forced to do that thing.
Dale Eastman: Looks like there's a term for people like you... OPCAs.• The common theme amongst OPCAs is a distrust for governments/institutions, and a belief that these individuals have some sort of secret knowledge of loopholes or "get out of jail free cards" that other legal professionals do not know about.• OPCAs originated primarily from left/center-left political groups in the mid-20th century, but have dramatically shifted towards the right/far-right of the political spectrum within the last couple decades.• Their roots stem from freemen-of-the-land, de-taxers, and sovereign citizen movements. Most people would be familiar with those terms from American culture/media influences, but it's important to note that those ideologies have arisen from Anglo-American society contemporaneous to each other in UK, Canadian, and American society.• Their recent popularity can be attributed to the rise of the internet as a consumer resource. Prior to the widespread adoption of the internet, most OPCAs were relegated to fringe literature, but with the rise in popularity of the internet de-taxers and sovereign citizens began creating websites and blogs dedicated to sharing and selling these types of legal council/advise in order to dupe customers into buying their services/information.• They operate by citing nonapplicable statues and laws, outdated or misappropriated legal terms/laws, and making claims that they are multiple people or entities in order to evade or escape liabilities. This includes things like citing the Magna Carta (rejection of the authority of the Crown), claiming they are two entities at the same time (a physical person and a corporate person to evade financial liability), discrediting tax codes (claiming the Stamp Act releases them from the CCC), etc etc.
"Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's COVID-19 vaccine mandate"According to you, a vaccine mandate is not forcing people against their will to be vaccinated.
Dale: That is correct, just as a seatbelt law does not force anyone to wear a seatbelt. It merely indicates the consequences of violating the law in question. And a mandate isn't even as "strong" as a law, yet here you are complaining about vaccine mandates, but not seatbelt laws. Curious, don't you think? 🤔
➽ It merely indicates the consequences of violating the law in question. The consequences for refusing the clot shot are?
Statistically greater risk of hospitalization, ICU, ventilation, and death.
➽ Statistically greater risk of hospitalization, ICU, ventilation, and death.
Well, I guess Dale Eastman has ceded all his points... whatever they were.
So tell me, what are your points, whatever they were?
Dale: Don't change the subject. We're still talking about your points, since this is your thread.
➽ We're still talking about your points, since this is your thread.There are "my" points and there are "your" contrary points. So here's the first paragraph of my words that you took exception to:I present this good faith apprisal, without malice, by the Natural Rights to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle myself and others; as shown in the Declaration of Independence, which as the founding document of this nation; preexisting the U.S. Constitution; justifying separation from England because of violations of humans' Natural Rights which had Natural Law repercussions.The above is a (re)statement of "my" points. Your turn. Please articulate, with specificity, exactly what your contrary point(s) are in relation to my (re)posted points.