Reasonable FE discussion with RJ? (I hope)

[Dale Eastman]

They're starting to reveal this technology to the public.

Your pompous snarkieness isn't befitting of you. You don't know what you don't know.

Are they defying gravity or repelling the earth's measurable negative charge?

Neither. They are using electrostatic forces to move air to create action-reaction thrust.
I've seen something like this before. Show me the video where it lifts in a vacuum.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VSYwaesDQBw

[Dale Eastman]

Why? We have air pressure on the earth. Just by changing the positive electrostatic potential it repells earth measurable negative charge. I'll wait for an experiment to qualify and quantify gravity. You see those elements on the periodic table. The more dense or heavier the element the more positive electrons it has. And because opposites attract the more positive electrons something has the "heavier" it is.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VSYwaesDQBw
https://youtu.be/VSYwaesDQBw?t=288

[Dale Eastman]

you realize your helping my point?

This is why understanding the primer fields is important

https://youtu.be/VSYwaesDQBw?t=288

[Dale Eastman]

so magnets don't work in a vaccume. I've never seen this, but it seems go go against your argument. How would you have a magnetic ball earth in a vaccume?

https://youtu.be/01F8V5IhB5k

Magnets?

Ionic wind does not work in a vacuum.
https://youtu.be/VSYwaesDQBw?t=288

[Dale Eastman]

Ions don't flow in a vaccume.

i don't beleive there's such a thing as "the vaccume of space" i don't see how this has anything to do with being evidence of a globe. What's the correlation? We have air pressure here in earth. Do you have an experiment that demonstrates high pressure next to low or no pressure without equalization or a physical barrier?

➽ so magnets don't work in a vaccume.

Magnets?

[Dale Eastman]

i meant the ionic wind generators. I was mistaken what what going on in that vaccume. The main thing was the ionic lifter(that little triangle that lifts off the surface because the induced a negative charge. And thus repelled the negative charge moving the triangle up. Now because matter has positive charges it creates the downward vector, then density and buoyancy sort everything else out. You've ignored my question for days now. Do you know of any experiment where you can have high pressure next to low or no pressure without it equalizing or without a physical barrier?

have you seen the fakery of the space station, so we can go ahead and discredit anything nasa shows us?
https://fb.watch/gDvyUBQLhL/

➽ have you seen the fakery of the space station

How is NASA faking the sunlit reflection of ISS?

https://www.issdetector.com/

What is holding it up in the sky?

[Dale Eastman]

How is something the size of a 747 that's on the dark side of earth reflecting sunlight that appears brighter than a star when it should be in the shadow of earth?

Do you have a way to verify what nasa tells you it is?

i guess we'll go into nasa lies now...

https://youtu.be/WAXk7DInAL0

https://youtu.be/hp2yWQLhRmU

https://youtu.be/uLcc0cGGpBc

more space fakery
https://youtu.be/LqzlQPlCv44

How is NASA faking the sunlit reflection of ISS?

Lemme simplify that question so you can actually answer instead of tossing more shitty diapers at the wall...

How is NASA faking a sunlit reflection?

[Dale Eastman]

https://youtu.be/hcskz1VgAmw

They're faking everything in space. You see a light in the sky. They tell you it's the iss. You can't verify that claim.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1CmpGQJzprc

[Dale Eastman]

Not a single video I've posted is throwing shit at the wall. Everything I've posted has been in support of my claims. All you've show is a shitty graphic of a trig equation that isnt reflective of what we observe. And you follow it with as homs and non sequiturs. You've been avoiding my question regarding air pressure next to a vaccume without a barrier because you know it's scientificly impossible. Your now just holding on to the ball your masters gave you as a child and it would shatter your illusion if you admit that you've been lied to your whole life. It's like when you found out Santa isn't real. It should be hard to understand you've been lied to at the highest level. I assume you understand they lied about every war, 911, the cervesa bug, why is it hard to comprehend these ppl lied about who we are and where we live. If they're hiding more land/ resources by giving you a prison for your mind, got you to believe you're an insignificant spec of dust living on an insignificant spec of dust in the vast emptiness of a godless universe rather than the center of an intelligently dedigned relm governed by electricity and magnetism. So how many points have gone in the "only works on a globe" basket? Air pressure next to a vaccume doesn't fit anywhere. The auto cad disproved your distances to the sun. The long distance photos refuted the proposed "r"... what am i missing?

The iss is claimed to be about the size of a 747. A 747 at cruising altitude is a just a spec in the sky. You think you could see it at double the elevation? How about 250 times the distance? Its a scientific fact that is angular size would be magnitudes to small to see it. But your going to keep fan-girling over nasa cgi.

https://youtu.be/nGoJEOaa5jQ

More fakery

How is NASA faking a sunlit reflection?

How is NASA making this fake reflection be trackable by these apps?
https://www.issdetector.com/

[Dale Eastman]

They know there's a light that crosses the sky. They know when it crossed. They make up a story about what the light is. Then feed you cgi. This isn't hard.

The iss shouldn't be reflecting so bright as a star, based on the inverse square law of light.

I can sit here and show hours of footage of nasa lying to you. But you're taking their word on what the iss is?

how could i go about verifying what it is in seeing?

This is going under the appeal to authority fallacy.

More fakery.
https://youtu.be/33osdP0QIEk

More fakery exposed.
https://youtu.be/86G9AyxF37k

How is NASA faking a sunlit reflection?

[Dale Eastman]

Because you don't even know what the iss is. Only what nasa has told you it is.

All you can truly say is is a light in the sky. Just like all the other illuminaries in the sky. But nasa told you is a modern marvel that was never built or tested on earth. It was constructed entirely in space, and there's not one video of its construction.

➽ They're faking everything in space. You see a light in the sky.

So I am going to ask you AGAIN!
How is NASA faking a sunlit reflection?

[Dale Eastman]

how do you know the sun is lighting the object you're seeing? Again anything beyond where we can reach is SPECULATION. and since you and i can't physically touch and measure it, we can't say wtf it is.

If anything is an outfitted aircraft on a set flight path. And they told you some made up story, kinda like the big bang was a made up story by a jesuit priest. Are you out of evidences that your moving to the appeal of authority?

How do you know it's not an electric phenomenon reacting to the toroidal feild that makes up the earth? You don't, and neither one of us can use this light in the sky as evidence for anything. What we can do is see all the parlor tricks they claim to be doing on the iss, and when we catch them faking things claimed to be done on the iss we can disregard everything they claim about the iss.

➽ anything beyond where we can reach is SPECULATION.

Double standard? Your speculation is okay, nobody else's is?

➽ If anything is an outfitted aircraft on a set flight path.

If it's an aircraft at altitude, doesn't that mean the source of light is reachable?

➽ how do you know the sun is lighting the object you're seeing?
➽ how could i go about verifying what it is in seeing?

Buy or borrow a good telescope and 𝙛𝙪𝙘𝙠𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙇𝙊𝙊𝙆!

An aircraft wouldn't be out of earth's shadow to cast reflected light from the other side of a ball. My brother has done several telescope observations of it. Have you seen all the fakery they're doing and saying they're on the iss? If they were really on something falling around the earth why would they have to fake it?

more fakery from the international fake station.
https://youtu.be/ZX4Hi1sZyVA

More fakery of the ifs.
https://youtu.be/k7OdCxGUph8

The Chinese faking space.
https://youtu.be/laWvzArUQPQ

➽ They're faking everything in space. You see a light in the sky.

How is NASA faking a light in the sky?

[Dale Eastman]

I'll take your silence on this question of air pressure next to vaccume as acquiesce to the fact that there is no evidence you can have vacuum next to a pressure system without equalization or a physical barrier. That's another one that doesn't go in the "globe basket".

https://youtu.be/w8x84lPBLKg

here since you like the appeal to authority fallacy. Here's 44 government documents that prove flat earth. https://youtu.be/HFGq4UUbhYY

x

x

You made this claim:
➽ They're faking everything in space. You see a light in the sky.

How is NASA faking a light in the sky?

[Dale Eastman]

are you saying it is not possible to fix lights to a 747? Are you aware of the 7d hologram projectors used now? https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=_XhgfnwVTts

Im my opinion they're intent is to use these blue beam projects to take an alien invasion. And the gullible spinny globe space believers are going to fall for it hook, line, sinker. If you don't think it's possible i feel you have a lack of imagination. But then again the only thing that's been to space is your imagination.

I'm calling you on your bullshit. This is a capture from your stupid "7D" vid. It was added as a top layer to the live camera feed... After the image was made into ones and zeros.

[Dale Eastman]

There's more like this...
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=In4CLX8wZFc

➽ how do you know the sun is lighting the object you're seeing?
➽ how could i go about verifying what it is in seeing?

Buy or borrow a good telescope and 𝙛𝙪𝙘𝙠𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙇𝙊𝙊𝙆!

➽ I'll take your silence on this
suggestion to Buy or borrow a good telescope and 𝙛𝙪𝙘𝙠𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙇𝙊𝙊𝙆! as your refusal to go look.