The Introduction of Liberty - Discussion of Income Tax Law

[Dale Eastman]

Question everything! It's time to uncover the truth about the largest financial scam in history: The Americans Who Lie in Order to Enslave You! https://rumble.com/v4rbhrk-the-americans-who-lie-in-order...

🌟 Want to keep all of your hard-earned money and say goodbye to the IRS? According to Title 26 of the U.S. Code, only certain individuals can legally be taxed, and you might not be one of them! Wake up and discover the real truths about the tax system and what it means for you! 🤑

▶️ https://drreality.news/?sld=charlesmoody
#Freedom #KnowledgeIsPower #Moody #ITSTM #ItsTime #USA #America

end ALL taxation!

https://synapticsparks.info

just a friendly heads up, Dave is pro-police, he ran for Sheriff and has repeatedly bad mouthed anarchy. When we kindly asked him in the most respectful manner about his campaign for Sheriff and his support for police, he responded with insults, ad hominem attacks and threats to "take care of us".
That is to say, given the seemingly anti-tax work he promotes of himself, he's not actually be the pro-freedom person he leads on to be and instead he's quite the aggressionist playing the political game of (at times) just simply saying what people want to hear in order to gain their support for his agendas.

��

out of curiosity, have you read “ income tax, shattering the myths”?

▶️ https://drreality.news/?sld=charlesmoody

Nope, I haven't but I can understand how it might be useful to some people. For me, I would seek out other mentors, preferably someone who didn't campaign to be a ruler over other people.

��

thank you for the feedback, sir. I’m pretty sure you have a reason for saying that. Do you mind sharing it with me?

Are you asking people to publicly self incriminate themselves? If so, why would you put people in that position knowing full well the government is a terrorist organization that has a habit of slandering and imprisoning whistleblowers, and people who disobey?

��

out of curiosity, have you read “ income tax, shattering the myths”?
▶️ https://drreality.news/?sld=charlesmoody”

I would rather seek material from someone who doesn't support oinkers and didn't try to become one. And if all you are going to do is try to get people to self incriminate and post material for that tyrant, then perhaps this isn't the group for you. The average anti-freedom statist group would be a better fit.

that’s what I thought. lol

I could spend my entire life reading material from tyrants. I'd rather not. You clearly have no problem with Dave trying to enslave people via trying to become a badged tyrant, so why would you even join a pro-freedom group?

it's CM's complete lack of knowing the statist Dave Champion that has me thinking CM doesn't understand the liberty movement.

Let’s stay focused on creating a supportive and respectful environment for everyone.

��

You mean, say nothing while you repeatedly post links of material by a tyrant and try to get people to self inciminate?

��

Thanks for the suggestion, but we're about the education of liberty in this group.

��

no, I’m not asking people to publicly incriminate themselves. That’s obvious to a dead man. For the record, I’d like to see more people educate themselves. (I haven’t filed a tax return in over 25 years. Boo! 👻)

Feel free to give us a shout if you’d prefer to hire an all-American business instead of the alternative.
CM's link not copy-pasted.

Spam? Really? See Mike, I didn't think he was on the up and up. Like politicians, I believe he's just saying what he thinks we want to hear.

��

there's a fine line between genuine patriotism and pretending to love one’s country. True patriotism involves actively supporting and uplifting our communities, advocating for justice, and engaging in meaningful dialogue. Perhaps we can focus on actions that reflect our values rather than just empty words,

��

there's the real CM. Just another shill fraud.

🤣😂

Please tell me the sole and exclusive activity engaged in by 'US persons' in every Treasury regulation issued since the inclusion of 'US person' in the Tax Code (1962).

What does extortion codes have to do with my freedom and liberty? Also notice how you pander to the gov's fictional word of "tax" instead of calling it what it really is, coercion/extortion/theft.

��

Y’all have a great evening. Take care now!

do not get addicted to escaping. Face your problems, handle your business, and triumph. No battle was ever won by those who run.

You mean pander to the terrorist government's system and glorify the thugs who support gov's armed thugs who enslave everyone and civilians would otherwise not be enslaved if not for them and that system?

��

Do you have any idea about the answer I attempted to post here in the 'Introduction of Liberty' group?

OCR'd: Tax law strictly limits Withholding Agents to withholding upon income of which persons and entities?

��

CHARLES: "Do not get addicted to escaping. Face your problems, handle your business, and triumph. No battle was ever won by those who run."

JEFF:
#1: Who is escaping? We are educating people about liberty and government. Working within the system is why we live in tyranny and permanent war.

#2: Identify the "problems." The problem IS government. We are facing this head on. It is you that sees politics as the answer.

#3: I turn your quote back to you, with a little modification; "No battle was ever won by those who choose to support politics as the answer to the tyranny created by politics."

CHARLES: "Do you have any idea about the answer I attempted to post here in the 'Introduction of Liberty' group?"

JEFF: Do you grasp the idea that the answer is NOT found within the political system?

I have an interest in what all three of you have to say.
I am unhappy with the direction this attempt at information exchange has taken.
Paraphrasing Champion's message: Stand on what the written words of tax law say. Champion is 30 years of not paying or filing income tax... Because he is obeying the tax laws as written.
He was once a bible thumping believer. That has changed as evidenced by his Tats. Champion does not know that he is still under the spell of his government school indoctrination. This does not change his knowledge of the written words of tax law. I have been aware of Dave's tax law teachings for 15+ years.
Laws are created in the political system so Jeff I can understand why you wrote: "the answer is NOT found within the political system" If the system changed the tax laws, the system would be admitting that it and all the congressturds have been openly lying since 1913.

DALE: "Champion is 30 years of not paying or filing income tax... Because he is obeying the tax laws as written."

JEFF: HOWEVER, Champion is not against taxation. THIS IS THE IMPORTANT PART OF THE DISCUSSION. He's said as much while running for office, when it was asked about how he expected to be paid. Previous to this he had claimed to be an anarchist. While running for office he took both sides (anarchist and statist) in order to gain support. Being against one tax does not make an individual a friend of liberty. For instance, the Democrats are opposed to war, except the wars created by the Democrats. Republicans are against anti-gun legislation, except anti-gun legislation created by Republicans.

��

If Charles Manson was still alive, and he told you that in the united States, traffic must drive on the right side of the street or road, Would you reject the truth of those words? Would you drive on the left side of the road because a convicted murderer told you don't?

The issue is NOT who or where the words came from. The issue is the veracity of the words.

I am personally annoyed by liberty folk bitching about that tax called "income" deliberately ignoring the words of law that they can use to legally stop paying an income tax on the fruits of their labor. Do you want to help folks legally stop paying the income tax that has not been imposed on payroll of Americans working in any of the 50 States united?

Dale Eastman I wouldn't listen to Manson and then think him a man of liberty, no more than I would listen to the words of Hitler, Stalin, Biden, Trump or Champion. The latter is a statist. Like all politicians, he won't show his true beliefs until he obtains political power. Go ahead and follow his words, but never forget that "legal" only works for the state. They don't let such things get in their way.

��

Here's my question YOU deliberately ignored:
Do you want to help folks legally stop paying the income tax that has not been imposed on payroll of Americans working in any of the 50 States united?

Here's my other words YOU deliberately ignored:

The issue is NOT who or where the words came from. The issue is the veracity of the words.

I hate having to repeat myself:
The issue is the veracity of the words.

Please admit or deny the veracity of the words of tax law.
(If you deny words you have never looked at...)

It is now my intent to present specific words. And after having done so, I am going to ask you and MC to admit or deny the veracity of the copy-pasted words of law.

PS: Ignore the murderer, drive on the left (wrong) side of the street or road. Fuck Around and Find Out.

Dale Eastman, Just a heads up, CM is gutlessly reporting comments in this group. 😂 That's the immaturity he's sunk to.

CM has been banned for reporting comments and posts to Facebook like the immature piece of sht he is who cuckolds for the thug Dave Champion who tried to rule people via a Sheriff badge. Fking scumbag.

DALE: "Here's my question YOU deliberately ignored:
Do you want to help folks legally stop paying the income tax that has not been imposed on payroll of Americans working in any of the 50 States united?"
JEFF: #1 I did not see your questions to me so I did not deliberately ignore you. #2 It is YOU, Champion and Moody Moody who "help" folks stop paying income tax. YOU post that stuff, and I don't. I don't stop you from doing it, but I do comment when you mention the statist wanna-be cop. The primary reason I don't post that stuff is because the government doesn't obey the law. If they go after you and others, I don't want to be the reason. Remember that Al Capone was brought down for income tax evasion charges.
DALE: "Here's my other words YOU deliberately ignored: The issue is NOT who or where the words came from."
JEFF: Repeat of my not deliberately ignoring you. I don't HAVE to respond if I don't see a need. In fact, the issue IS "who or where the words came from." You have seen me many times attempt to educate others for using the words and quotes from statists. Champion lied many times over the years in order to gain support. You are welcome to idolize statists, but I am not required to follow that path.
I do not care what Champion writes. I go by the history of the government. Never forget that Al Capone was brought down for income tax evasion charges. I will guess that many others were too. You want to trust the government to obey words then be my guest. DO NOT bring yourself to the low level of "shaming" others to obey you!

��

Dale Eastman, Have you considered that if I explain the appropriate answer to you it would self incriminate?
- Here's something else to consider, are we to think Dave has some magical words and magical legal insight that the lawyers of celebrities with 100 times Dave's wealthy don't have?
To explain that consideration further and for just one example, Wesley Snipes left the country over the gov's extortion demands so he could avoid being thrown in a cage and only after 100s of thousands of dollars in lawyer fees and years later, PLUS eventually being forced to pay said extortion anyway, only then was he able to come back to the USA without threat of being in a cage.
-- Consider the fact that there are NO LAWS that can save a civilian from the gov's systems, after all, the tyrant doesn't play fair, it doesn't even play by its own rules, it will change the rules at the drop of a hat, it will make up new rules on the spot and if gov wants to fry someone it will.
For what reason are we to believe that some boot licking thug Dave has the magic answer to defeat the government by using the gov's systems?
What's next? Begging the government within the gov's systems to declare us all Sovereign citizens exempt from its rule?
I don't understand why you are so hell bent on believing in that boot licker like he's some sort of messiah.
-- Consider, you have only gotten away with what you have gotten way with because there's 300 million people in this country and the tyrant machine can't attack everyone.
And if/should you unfortunately land in its crosshairs, I highly doubt any of the videos from the boot licking thug piece of sht Dave will solve your legal problems or anyone else's legal problems for that matter.
He's selling false hope predicated upon the fact that the chances of one of his followers actually being prosecuted is slim, and not because his so-called legal solutions are so good but instead simply because the tyrant machine can't attack everyone at the same time.
I don't care if that piece of sht has the secret to how the pyramids were built, he's a fking tyrant who refuses to denounce is intent and wishes to be a thug with a badge.

��

Dale Eastman, And btw, I had typed another comment earlier with other important factors in reply to your question but it was interrupted by the gutless piece of worthless dg-sht Charles B Moody reporting comments and posts in this group because he's an immature ccccooooowwwwarrrrd.
Of which I mentioned to you about earlier, but I'm mentioning it again because I don't want you to think my comment above is that comment (it was a totally different comment).

[Dale Eastman]

Quote from:  MC on 26 August @ 20:54
Dave is pro-police, he ran for Sheriff and has repeatedly bad mouthed anarchy. When we kindly asked him in the most respectful manner about his campaign for Sheriff and his support for police, he responded with insults, ad hominem attacks and threats to "take care of us".

Absent a link, this is just water cooler gossip. I can not judge the veracity of the claim. I am a pedantic asshole. You forgot to cross a few T's and dot a few I's.

Quote from:  MC on 26 August @ 21:00
Nope, I haven't but I can understand how it might be useful to some people. For me, I would seek out other mentors, preferably someone who didn't campaign to be a ruler over other people.

Charles Manson below. "Nuff said.

Quote from:  MC on 26 August @ 21:13
Are you asking people to publicly self incriminate themselves? If so, why would you put people in that position knowing full well the government is a terrorist organization that has a habit of slandering and imprisoning whistleblowers, and people who disobey?

I expect better thinking from you.
𝟙. What, specifically, are you implying is being "disobeyed"? Please articulate with precision.
𝟚. Can rule X be disobeyed if rule X does not exist?

Quote from:  CM on 26 August @ 21:42
Let’s stay focused on creating a supportive and respectful environment for everyone.

I've read your comments where you ignored your own advice.

Quote from:  MC on 26 August @ 21:43
You mean, say nothing while you repeatedly post links of material by a tyrant and try to get people to self incriminate?

MC, you have just claimed and accused others a second time of attempting to cause people to self-incriminate. I want to be sure I understand what you are saying when you accuse somebody of attempting to cause people to self-incriminate.

Self-incrimination
: incrimination of oneself
specifically : the giving of testimony which will likely subject one to criminal prosecution
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/self-incrimination

𝟛. Doesn't one need to violate; break a law to be criminally charged?
𝟜. Can a law that doesn't exist be violated or broken?

Quote from:  JS on 26 August @ 21:43
Thanks for the suggestion, but we're about the education of liberty in this group.

Rhetorical and not numbered to make a point:
Can I educate my neighbor about how to change spark plugs in his car if I don't put the required tools in his hands to change the plugs? Can I educate myself about shingling a roof if I don't have the proper tools in my hands? Can I educate anybody about making a camp fire without the tools to prep the wood?

This one is NOT rhetorical and it has a number:
𝟝. Does the problem to be solved to achieve liberty have a bearing on what tools will be required to achieve liberty?
𝟞. Without presentment of tools to create liberty, is achieving liberty actually being taught?
𝟟. Please list the problems to be solved?
𝟠. Please list the tools required to solve the problems to achieve liberty?

Quote from:  JS on 26 August @ 21:49
I didn't think he was on the up and up. Like politicians, I believe he's just saying what he thinks we want to hear.

I see you ignoring what he has been saying. He's saying the same thing I've been saying for quite awhile now. I'll address this point further at a later time.

Quote from:  MC on 26 August @ 22:02
What does extortion codes have to do with my freedom and liberty? Also notice how you pander to the gov's fictional word of "tax" instead of calling it what it really is, coercion/extortion/theft.

You wrote, I quote: "you pander to the gov's fictional word of "tax""
That is an error of assumption on your part. In making that errant assumption about me, You have just accused me of and implied that I am doing actions with bad intent.

The four of us ARE on the same side, The delusions and imaginations of two of us, "notwithstanding."
The negative meta-communication of the claim is forgiven since I can understand the reasons of your error.

In the case of the U.S. Federal Income Tax, all of you Americans paying this tax on your payroll are doing this VOLUNTARILY. The coercion/extortion/theft does not happen until after you volunteer to pay this 'payroll' tax.

https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/pander-to
pander to someone/something
to do or provide exactly what a person or group wants, especially when it is not acceptable, reasonable, or approved of, usually in order to get some personal advantage:

I find humor in you calling the kettle black. By that definition the two of you are pandering to what government wants. Government wants you to NOT look at the written words of the Income Tax laws.

Quote from:  MC on 26 August @ 22:09
You mean pander to the terrorist government's system and glorify the thugs who support gov's armed thugs who enslave everyone and civilians would otherwise not be enslaved if not for them and that system?

You have absolutely NO CLUE as to the government's Income (payroll) Tax system. You DON'T WANT TO KNOW, thus YOU are pandering to government's desire for you to choose to be ignorant of that system.

The people at the top know the truth of the laws. The flunkies, drones, and lower managers do not; Because the compartmentalization of information keeps them ignorant.

Quote from:  JS on 27 August @ 08:04
DALE: "Champion is 30 years of not paying or filing income tax... Because he is obeying the tax laws as written."
JEFF: HOWEVER, Champion is not against taxation. THIS IS THE IMPORTANT PART OF THE DISCUSSION. He's said as much while running for office, when it was asked about how he expected to be paid. Previous to this he had claimed to be an anarchist. While running for office he took both sides (anarchist and statist) in order to gain support. Being against one tax does not make an individual a friend of liberty. For instance, the Democrats are opposed to war, except the wars created by the Democrats. Republicans are against anti-gun legislation, except anti-gun legislation created by Republicans.

No! Your hearsay is NOT part of the discussion. I can NOT opine about the veracity of your claim. I don't know, and I don't care. And I don't need to quote Champion on anything...

I will test your critical thinking ability.

Quote from:  JS on 27 August @ 09:57
Dale Eastman I wouldn't listen to Manson and then think him a man of liberty, no more than I would listen to the words of Hitler, Stalin, Biden, Trump or Champion. The latter is a statist. Like all politicians, he won't show his true beliefs until he obtains political power. Go ahead and follow his words, but never forget that "legal" only works for the state. They don't let such things get in their way.

I'm not asking you to think that Manson is a man of liberty
You are not the first person I have engaged with that refuses to look where I am directing them to look. You are not the first person I have engaged with that attempts to Distract, Deflect, Divert, Disrupt, and/or Derail from the topics/points I present.

Your words just told me that you don't care what reality is if it contradicts or denies your world view. Take your fingers out of your ears and stop singing "La-la-la-la."

Quote from:  JS on 27 August @ 18:33
DALE: "Here's my question YOU deliberately ignored:
Do you want to help folks legally stop paying the income tax that has not been imposed on payroll of Americans working in any of the 50 States united?"
JEFF: #1 I did not see your questions to me so I did not deliberately ignore you.

You get the benefit of doubt. I apologize for assuming. I too have missed posts. So my SOP is to re-ask questions that are not answered. I have had a lot of questions ignored. Then that person ghosts me. <Shrug>

JS on 27 August @ 18:33
#2 It is YOU, Champion and Moody Moody who "help" folks stop paying income tax. YOU post that stuff, and I don't. I don't stop you from doing it, but I do comment when you mention the statist wanna-be cop.

I stopped sourcing Champion. You are confusing my posts with Moody's posts.

JS on 27 August @ 18:33
The primary reason I don't post that stuff is because the government doesn't obey the law. If they go after you and others, I don't want to be the reason.

I told an IRS flunky that I had no intention of filing a 1040 for the year under discussion. I told her that I would be glad to discuss why at my willful failure to file trial.

I'm calling you on your errant reification of government.

Here is why: https://www.synapticsparks.info/dialog/index.php?topic=1756.0

JS on 27 August @ 18:33
Remember that Al Capone was brought down for income tax evasion charges.

This is part of the social engineering to make people afraid of the IRS. Where those charges brought under section 7201, 7203, or a prior incarnation of those sections? Not numbered because as a rhetorical question, I don't expect you to actually be able to answer.

By making that statement you have just pandered to keeping the government tax lie hidden.

JS on 27 August @ 18:33
DALE: "Here's my other words YOU deliberately ignored: The issue is NOT who or where the words came from."
JEFF: Repeat of my not deliberately ignoring you.

And repeat, I apologize for my errant assumption.

JS on 27 August @ 18:33
I don't HAVE to respond if I don't see a need. In fact, the issue IS "who or where the words came from."

If you don't see a need to respond and don't respond, then you ARE ignoring me.

JS on 27 August @ 18:33
You have seen me many times attempt to educate others for using the words and quotes from statists.

Yes. Including myself. So I am aware of your bias.

JS on 27 August @ 18:33
Champion lied many times over the years in order to gain support.

I can neither admit nor deny your claim. What I will do is notice you have just posted a claim without evidence.
I will also provide a counter-claim. I've been aware of Champion for about 15 years. He has NEVER lied about what the income tax law says. I verified the information he has presented by reading those laws on DotGov websites.

JS on 27 August @ 18:33
You are welcome to idolize statists, but I am not required to follow that path.

Your accusation of me idolizing Statists has been noted.

JS on 27 August @ 18:33
I do not care what Champion writes. I go by the history of the government.

I see you claiming that you only go by your biases. Some wrong. Some correct.

JS on 27 August @ 18:33
Never forget that Al Capone was brought down for income tax evasion charges. I will guess that many others were too. You want to trust the government to obey words then be my guest.

This is the second time you have pandered to government hiding the I-tax facts.

JS on 27 August @ 18:33
DO NOT bring yourself to the low level of "shaming" others to obey you!

Your are "assuming" and making shit up about me.

Quote from:  MC on 27 August @ 19:24
Dale Eastman, Have you considered that if I explain the appropriate answer to you it would self incriminate?

𝟡. What law would you be criminally breaking to incriminate yourself?

Quote from:  MC on 27 August @ 19:24
- Here's something else to consider, are we to think Dave has some magical words and magical legal insight that the lawyers of celebrities with 100 times Dave's wealthy don't have?

You don't have to think anything on this issue. The magical words and magical legal insight is THE WRITTEN WORDS OF LAW. Thus the answer to the question is Yes.

Quote from:  MC on 27 August @ 19:24
To explain that consideration further and for just one example, Wesley Snipes left the country over the gov's extortion demands so he could avoid being thrown in a cage and only after 100s of thousands of dollars in lawyer fees and years later, PLUS eventually being forced to pay said extortion anyway, only then was he able to come back to the USA without threat of being in a cage.

𝟙𝟘. Please put your finger on the law the IRS used to rape Snipes?

Quote from:  MC on 27 August @ 19:24
-- Consider the fact that there are NO LAWS that can save a civilian from the gov's systems, after all, the tyrant doesn't play fair, it doesn't even play by its own rules, it will change the rules at the drop of a hat, it will make up new rules on the spot and if gov wants to fry someone it will.

I'm willing to bet that you do not play a very good game of chess. Just like in chess, one must see the pressures brought to bear and the counter pressures to defend against the pressures brought to bear. It is the same thing when dealing with liars. Use their own words against them.

Quote from:  MC on 27 August @ 19:24
For what reason are we to believe that some boot licking thug Dave has the magic answer to defeat the government by using the gov's systems?

You don't know what those magic words are. You don't want to consider what the power of those words are. You use the government's own words against it. You have willfully turned away from those words.

Quote from:  MC on 27 August @ 19:24
What's next? Begging the government within the gov's systems to declare us all Sovereign citizens exempt from its rule?

Don't beg. Inform. Using its words and asking questions about its words.

Quote from:  MC on 27 August @ 19:24
I don't understand why you are so hell bent on believing in that boot licker like he's some sort of messiah.

Are his words accurate? We can dispense with Champion and your hatred and bias.

Quote from:  MC on 27 August @ 19:24
-- Consider, you have only gotten away with what you have gotten way with because there's 300 million people in this country and the tyrant machine can't attack everyone.

You have a higher chance of catching an audit if you file a form 1040 that you are NOT required to file than not filing at all.

Quote from:  MC on 27 August @ 19:24
And if/should you unfortunately land in its crosshairs, I highly doubt any of the videos from the boot licking thug piece of sht Dave will solve your legal problems or anyone else's legal problems for that matter.

I was in the IRS' crosshairs. I said I would be glad to explain why I refuse to submit Form 1040s in my willful failure to file trial.

You "highly doubt" means you simply don't fucking know what you are spewing on about.

Quote from:  MC on 27 August @ 19:24
He's selling false hope predicated upon the fact that the chances of one of his followers actually being prosecuted is slim, and not because his so-called legal solutions are so good but instead simply because the tyrant machine can't attack everyone at the same time.

Having never read the I-tax law, you don't know what you are blathering on about.

Quote from:  MC on 27 August @ 19:24
I don't care if that piece of sht has the secret to how the pyramids were built, he's a fking tyrant who refuses to denounce is intent and wishes to be a thug with a badge.

I can neither confirm nor deny the veracity of your hate filled claim.

Quote from:  MC on 27 August @ 19:33
Dale Eastman, And btw, I had typed another comment earlier with other important factors in reply to your question but it was interrupted by the gutless piece of worthless dg-sht Charles B Moody reporting comments and posts in this group because he's an immature ccccooooowwwwarrrrd.
Of which I mentioned to you about earlier, but I'm mentioning it again because I don't want you to think my comment above is that comment (it was a totally different comment).

I will be giving Moody a link to this post of mine. Both of you calling each other names does NOT advance liberty.

[Dale Eastman]

Dale Eastman. In my opinion, the most important "take away" from this thread, is that individuals should not trust politicians to have the answers that will lead to liberty and peace.[/color[

That is not where our ideas n thoughts collide. I agree 100% with your liberty concept.

I am again going to call you on ignoring MY points presented. You have also chosen to ignore my questions, Numbered so I can track the willful ignorance. Yes... I am accusing you of willful ignorance.

Here's those questions, asked a second time:
𝟝. Does the problem to be solved to achieve liberty have a bearing on what tools will be required to achieve liberty?
𝟞. Without presentment of tools to create liberty, is achieving liberty actually being taught?
𝟟. Please list the problems to be solved?
𝟠. Please list the tools required to solve the problems to achieve liberty?

https://www.synapticsparks.info/dialog/index.php?topic=1777.msg17177#msg17177

Dale Eastman because you keep insulting me by insisting that I am ignoring you, I DO CHOOSE to now ignore your questions.

I'm insulting you?? I am a pedantic asshole. I take pleasure in causing Cognitive Dissonance. Especially when some person posts their belief as if it is an unmitigated reality which is easily punctured with logic and facts.

You're butt-hurt because I claimed you ignored my question(s). Did you answer those four questions. Yes or No? The answer is "No". You did not answer those questions. On 27 August @ 18:33 you wrote: I don't HAVE to respond if I don't see a need. That is you admitting that YOU DON'T RESPOND. This is you admitting to ignoring questions.

Any question not answered is a question ignored.

Insult?.. You interact like a Lefty.

As a Pedantic Asshole, I will keep asking my questions until they are addressed.

Here's those questions, asked a third time:
𝟝. Does the problem to be solved to achieve liberty have a bearing on what tools will be required to achieve liberty?
𝟞. Without presentment of tools to create liberty, is achieving liberty actually being taught?
𝟟. Please list the problems to be solved?
𝟠. Please list the tools required to solve the problems to achieve liberty?

This is the THIRD time this question has been asked. You quoted this question so this is the FOURTH time the question has been in front of your eyes:
Do you want to help folks legally stop paying the income tax that has not been imposed on payroll of Americans working in any of the 50 States united?"

My focus has changed. Go here to see words of the new focus.