WF

[Dale Eastman]

Larken Rose
You are litterally voting everytime you support someone elses business either by refferal or buying from them.

You are voting for them to be able to continue doing business.

If you vote the same way for someone to defend another human being as a natural/common law or constitutional Sheriff's then you are also voting in a positive manner.

And you might also understand Spooner's quote to mean exactly this when he said that "voting can be an act of self defence"

If you vote for a politician to become a Legislator,
You vote for a person who drafts and enacts rules.
You vote for somebody who makes rules people must obey under penalty of death.

If you vote for a politician to become a Mayor, Governor, or President,
You vote for a person to enforce the rules made by Legislators.
You vote for somebody to make people obey or kill people if they resist.

Thus, If you vote, you give your consent to a gang of criminal extortionists and validate a corrupt system.
Carlo Gambino or Vito Genovese.
VOTE! VOTE! VOTE!

Choose your next criminal syndicate extortion ruler.

Where have I ever claimed to support any politician?

I will give you consideration and the benefit of doubt.

To specifically answer your question, you did so with these words:

⚠ If you vote the same way for someone to defend another human being as a natural/common law or constitutional Sheriff's then you are also voting in a positive manner. ⛔

And as you see with all the replies to your post, I'm not the only one to see this in this way.

And you are simply missunderstanding what it is I am arguing.

Or do you claim that those who arr incapable to defend themselves or have a network to get help should just get ducked and not get any form of justice what so ever?

There will always be something called law and that law shall be enforced by protecting the individuals natural right.

Unless you actually plan to infringe on others natural right and intentionally or unnotentially are trying to cause them harm, loss, and damage, then you have nothing to fear.

That sheriff should only enforce just laws and if you do not like it then you can try to support someone else as sheriff to remove the current one.

The Sheriff actuall job is to make sure that you are left the duck alone unless you actually are causing others harm, loss, and damage.

And no, you are not voting with a ducking ballot either.

You vote by actually supoorting the office like you would support any other business.

It's about security for those who are incapable of defending themselves.

➽ And you are simply missunderstanding what it is I am arguing.

I will admit that my misunderstanding your point is possible. I will also suggest maybe what you are trying to present could be a little better thought out.

I ask questions. I ask a lot of questions. My purpose is to dig the truth out of claims and beliefs. If I misunderstood you, then my questions should bring enlightenment to myself and all the others giving you shit for your posts. Or, conversely assist you in finding a better way to present your point.

➽ Or do you claim that those who arr incapable to defend themselves or have a network to get help should just get ducked and not get any form of justice what so ever?

What, specifically, do you mean by "justice" as you have just used the word?
What, specifically, do you mean by people unable to defend themselves?
What, specifically, are the traits, properties, attributes, & characteristics of these people unable to defend themselves?

➽ There will always be something called law and that law shall be enforced by protecting the individuals natural right.

What, specifically, do you mean by "law?

Shall be enforced by who, specifically, and by what authority?

By authority I mean any higher claim on any human or their property greater than that human has over their self or their property.

What, specifically, do you mean by "natural right"?

➽ Unless you actually plan to infringe on others natural right and intentionally or unnotentially are trying to cause them harm, loss, and damage, then you have nothing to fear.

That is an interesting interjection by you. I don't plan on intentionally harming others. Who do you think would be planning on doing such harm, even if they don't recognize that harm is exactly what they will be doing to others?

➽ That sheriff should only enforce just laws and if you do not like it then you can try to support someone else as sheriff to remove the current one.

Sheriffs, their deputies, and any police are in the category of LEO's. That's their job  Law Enforcement Officers. The enforce laws. What laws. The laws written by legislators.

But here's the thing. If the office of Sheriff is subject to being filled by voting, then the Sheriff candidates are politicians.

➽ The Sheriff actuall job is to make sure that you are left the duck alone unless you actually are causing others harm, loss, and damage.

Yeah, that's the PR BS propaganda the State claims as its purpose for existing.

➽ And no, you are not voting with a ducking ballot either.

Ballots are exactly how elected offices get filled. So WTF are you attempting to say?

➽ You vote by actually supoorting the office like you would support any other business.

You're a little light on the details as to exactly how you intend that could work. Elaborate please?

➽ It's about security for those who are incapable of defending themselves.

I'm sorry. Exactly what do you mean when you say "It"? What, exactly, is about security for those incapable of defending themselves?

What type of defense against what type of potential harm are you saying is the thing to be addressed?

And why would people not be capable of defending themselves from this potential malicious harm?