VH

[Dale Eastman]

❶YDOM. You don't own me; I don't own you.
❷You have no authority over me. I do not have to obey you.
❸I have no authority over you. You do not have to obey me.
❹No person can delegate authority they do not have.
❺If I won an election with 99.999% of the vote for me,
    I still have no authority over you. You still do not have to obey me.
❻This is true of EVERY politician in EVERY government office.

Share with or without my ID.
https://www.facebook.com/dale.eastman.75/
http://www.synapticsparks.info/
https://www.facebook.com/IlluminateTheDelusions/

Dale Eastman this has got to be the most tortured rationale I've ever seen.
And I was raised catholic.

I don't really care if you were raised Catlicker or not. Unless the dogma and inculcation motivates you to want to harm me.
You claim my 6 points are not rational. Your claim. Your burden of proof.

❶YDOM. You don't own me; I don't own you.
True or false?

You're the one instilling dogma with your 6 steps of tortured logic.

Dale Eastman tell me, brainiac, if someone is on your property, do you have any authority over them?

You are claiming my logic is tortured.

How is
❶YDOM. You don't own me; I don't own you.
tortured logic.

I mean, you can tell me a hundred times that there's no smoking in the house, but whatever. I'll use your coffee table as an ashtray.

Why do you refuse to admit or deny that my logic in #1 is tortured?

How is
❶YDOM. You don't own me; I don't own you.
tortured logic?

Dale Eastman let's start with a baseline:

Based on your 6 steps to imbecility, it's perfectly okay for me to walk into your home and piss on the rug.

The baseline is:
❶YDOM. You don't own me; I don't own you.

Either agree or disagree so you and I can continue to examine my "tortured rational".

Your post was a late hit, so to speak, in American Football terms. It is worthy of my attention AFTER you address your claims I have challenged.

➽ Dale Eastman tell me, brainiac, if someone is on your property, do you have any authority over them?

Dale Eastman you're incapable of reading the other 5 points?

You keep restating the premise but you don't seem capable of supporting it.

Do you know what this is called?

Dogma.

I wrote ALL 6 points. I am quite aware of what the points are.

You have claimed "6 steps of tortured logic."

❶YDOM. You don't own me; I don't own you.
Is step one tortured logic?
Yes or No?

[Dale Eastman]

I don't believe you're aware of much.

Your entire YDOM shtick is base anarchy; an environment in which I can take anything you deem to be personal property and keep it for myself. You could take it back, of course. But then I'd just take it back again......

Dale Eastman I mean, wouldn't it be useful to have a mediator? Someone we both could agree on is too much to ask; we are both selfish. So maybe someone who's fair and impartial? Or at least as close to fair and impartial as we can reasonably expect?

A comment without insult. Thank you.

As I pointed out, you did ask a valid question. And it is my intent to get to it. That is why I quoted it. A reminder for myself to address your question. Just like my original post that prompted you to respond, I have canned comments addressing your valid question.

First though, you made a generic claim about my six points in toto. (In toto: In all; in the whole; wholly; without qualification.) So I am specifically challenging the in toto claim, one piece at a time.


❶YDOM. You don't own me; I don't own you.

You have refused to address my question, Is step one of my "YDOM shtick" tortured logic? 

Your failure to answer means step one is NOT tortured logic.
Thank you for admitting that step one is NOT tortured logic.

❷You have no authority over me. I do not have to obey you.

From your question I quoted, and some of your words not quoted, this is where I expected you to challenge my claim.

I expect a disagreement because I am projecting and assuming, you and I do not agree on the definition of authority.

You have claimed "6 steps of tortured logic."

❷You have no authority over me. I do not have to obey you.
Is step two tortured logic?
Yes or No?

Qui tacet consentire videtur, ubi loqui debuit ac potuit.
Translation: "Who is silent, when he ought to and might have spoken, is seen to agree.”

Thank you for admitting that step one and step two are NOT tortured logic.

❸I have no authority over you. You do not have to obey me.
Is step three tortured logic?

Qui tacet consentire videtur, ubi loqui debuit ac potuit.
Translation: "Who is silent, when he ought to and might have spoken, is seen to agree.”

Thank you for admitting that steps one, two, and three are NOT tortured logic.

❹No person can delegate authority they do not have.

Is step four tortured logic?

Qui tacet consentire videtur, ubi loqui debuit ac potuit.
Translation: "Who is silent, when he ought to and might have spoken, is seen to agree.”

Thank you for admitting that steps one, two, three, and four are NOT tortured logic.

❺If I won an election with 99.999% of the vote for me,
I still have no authority over you. You still do not have to obey me.

Is step five tortured logic?

[Dale Eastman]

This is a specific call out of VH for his cowardice.
I am posting this in all.politics.1 and on my status wall dale.eastman.75

Just like many other statist idjits I have had interactions with, you make a claim about me, I ask questions about your claim, you shut up and go away refusing to support your ERRANT, BOGUS, LYING claim.

YOU have claimed MY logic is tortured... Yet you refuse to engage using YOUR logic to highlight the TORTURED part of MY logic.

If MY logic is so tortured, showing me to be the idiot you beLIEve I am should be simple... Easy peasy.

So I am asking you to show me to be the idiot you beLIEve I am.

❶YDOM. You don't own me; I don't own you.

How, exactly, is point one tortured logic?

❷You have no authority over me. I do not have to obey you.

How, exactly, is point two tortured logic?

❸I have no authority over you. You do not have to obey me.

How, exactly, is point three tortured logic?

❹No person can delegate authority they do not have.

How, exactly, is point four tortured logic?

❺If I won an election with 99.999% of the vote for me, I still have no authority over you. You still do not have to obey me.

How, exactly, is point five tortured logic?

[Dale Eastman]

This is a specific call out #2 of VH for his cowardice.

Just like many other statist idjits I have had interactions with, you make a claim about me, I ask questions about your claim, you shut up and go away refusing to support your ERRANT, BOGUS, LYING claim.

YOU have claimed MY logic is tortured... Yet you refuse to engage using YOUR logic to highlight the TORTURED part of MY logic.

If MY logic is so tortured, showing me to be the idiot you beLIEve I am should be simple... Easy peasy.

So I am asking you to show me to be the idiot you beLIEve I am.

❶YDOM. You don't own me; I don't own you.

How, exactly, is point one tortured logic?

❷You have no authority over me. I do not have to obey you.

How, exactly, is point two tortured logic?

❸I have no authority over you. You do not have to obey me.

How, exactly, is point three tortured logic?

❹No person can delegate authority they do not have.

How, exactly, is point four tortured logic?

❺If I won an election with 99.999% of the vote for me, I still have no authority over you. You still do not have to obey me.

How, exactly, is point five tortured logic?

Call outs:
July 15, 2021
July 19, 2021

[Dale Eastman]

This is a specific call out #3 of VH for his cowardice.

Just like many other statist idjits I have had interactions with, you make a claim about me, I ask questions about your claim, you shut up and go away refusing to support your ERRANT, BOGUS, LYING claim.

YOU have claimed MY logic is tortured... Yet you refuse to engage using YOUR logic to highlight the TORTURED part of MY logic.

If MY logic is so tortured, showing me to be the idiot you beLIEve I am should be simple... Easy peasy.

So I am asking you to show me to be the idiot you beLIEve I am.

❶YDOM. You don't own me; I don't own you.

How, exactly, is point one tortured logic?

❷You have no authority over me. I do not have to obey you.

How, exactly, is point two tortured logic?

❸I have no authority over you. You do not have to obey me.

How, exactly, is point three tortured logic?

❹No person can delegate authority they do not have.

How, exactly, is point four tortured logic?

❺If I won an election with 99.999% of the vote for me, I still have no authority over you. You still do not have to obey me.

How, exactly, is point five tortured logic?

Call outs:
July 15, 2021
July 19, 2021
July 24, 2021

[Dale Eastman]

This is a specific call out #4 of VH for his cowardice.

Just like many other statist idjits I have had interactions with, you make a claim about me, I ask questions about your claim, you shut up and go away refusing to support your ERRANT, BOGUS, LYING claim.

YOU have claimed MY logic is tortured... Yet you refuse to engage using YOUR logic to highlight the TORTURED part of MY logic.

If MY logic is so tortured, showing me to be the idiot you beLIEve I am should be simple... Easy peasy.

So I am asking you to show me to be the idiot you beLIEve I am.

❶YDOM. You don't own me; I don't own you.

How, exactly, is point one tortured logic?

❷You have no authority over me. I do not have to obey you.

How, exactly, is point two tortured logic?

❸I have no authority over you. You do not have to obey me.

How, exactly, is point three tortured logic?

❹No person can delegate authority they do not have.

How, exactly, is point four tortured logic?

❺If I won an election with 99.999% of the vote for me, I still have no authority over you. You still do not have to obey me.

How, exactly, is point five tortured logic?

Call outs:
July 15, 2021
July 19, 2021
July 24, 2021
Sept 10, 2021