LEGAL DISCLAIMER
I am not a Tax Lawyer, Nor do I play Dan Evans on the internet.
I am not a Certified Public Accountant, Nor do I play Paul Thomas on the internet.
I am not an Enrolled Agent, Nor do I play Richard Macdonald on the internet.
DO NOT TAKE MY WORD FOR ANYTHING ON THIS PAGE.
Go look it up for yourself.

Them

Brian Rookard - Does what lawyers do best

Table of Contents

       I want to specially thank IRS collaborator Brian Rookard for his efforts to make clear, how the words "includes" and "including"  are used to confuse, obfuscate, and deceive Joe Sixpack.

       That was sarcasm.  Mr. Rookard is all about confusing, obfuscating and deceiving Joe and his friends.  Before you continue with this page, it would be helpful for you to read the page about "Includes" and "Including". (Opens in a new window.)

        Mr. Rookard made up the following situation in an attempt to argue that the use of the word includes is not a limiting word in tax law. 

  "The recipe for brownies includes eggs."
  Please tell us whether:
  (a) The recipe includes other ingredients besides eggs.
  (b) The recipe includes only eggs.

        Mr. Rookard attempts to argue that the use of the word includes is not a limiting word in tax law this by citing 7701(c). 

7701(c)  The terms ''includes'' and ''including'' when used in a definition contained in this title shall not be deemed to exclude other things otherwise within the meaning of the term defined.

        I snip in steps so that even the most daft of the collaborators can follow along, lest I be accused of changing meanings.   We know that this is about the use of "includes" and "including" in this title, (this title, the Internal Revenue Code, or colloquially, Tax Law), So I will remove "when used in a definition contained in this title"

7701(c) The terms "includes" and "including"... shall not be deemed to exclude other things otherwise within the meaning of the term defined.

        That is still a little unwieldy, so I remove "be deemed to":

7701(c) The terms "includes" and "including"... shall... not exclude other things otherwise within the meaning of the term defined.

        And I remove "other ":

7701(c) The terms "includes" and "including"... shall... not exclude... things otherwise within the meaning of the term defined.

        And I remove "defined":

7701(c) The terms "includes" and "including"... shall... not exclude... things otherwise within the meaning of the term...

        Having distilled section 7701(c)  to the exact essence of its meaning, I can now proceed.



        Repeating what Black's Law dictionary has to say about the word "includes".

"Include. (Lat. Inclaudere, to shut in. keep within.)  To confine within, hold as an inclosure. take in, attain, shut up, contain, inclose, comprise, comprehend, embrase, involve. Term may, according to context, express an enlargement and have the meaning of and or in addition to, or merely specify a particular thing already included within general words theretofore used. "Including" within statute is interpreted as a word of enlargement or of illustrative application as well as a word of limitation.
Premier Products Co. v. Cameron,
240 Or. 123, 400 P.2d 227, 228."


        The first concept in Black's is: "To confine within, hold as an inclosure."  In that case, includes grabs what is listed, AND NO MORE.   The root of the term include,  is basically to surround.  To surround is to have an "inside" and an "outside".  Something is then either "inside" or it is "outside".   One or the other.   There is no third place. 

        "The term include may, according to context, express enlargement..."   which means to surround more, to have another something or somethings on the "inside".  "May" as in  'to indicate a possibility', that there could be enlargement.  Again, according to context.

Ejusdem generis
(eh-youse-dem generous) v adj. Latin for "of the same kind," used to interpret loosely written statutes. Where a law lists specific classes of persons or things and then refers to them in general, the general statements only apply to the same kind of persons or things specifically listed. Example: if a law refers to automobiles, trucks, tractors, motorcycles and other motor-powered vehicles, "vehicles" would not include airplanes, since the list was of land-based transportation.


Congress creates a class of things by defining the class.
Congress defines the class by giving an example of items in the class
The items in the class then define the class

Congress also names or labels the class.
The term is the name or label of the class.
Thus a term is the name or label of a class defined by the items in the class.


        Returning to Mr. Rookard's setup:

 "The recipe for brownies includes eggs."
  Please tell us whether:
  (a) The recipe includes other ingredients besides eggs.
  (b) The recipe includes only eggs.
  • The TERM is defined to include things within "the meaning of term defined".
  • The TERM is NOT defined within the dictionary meaning of the WORD used.
  • The TERM is defined as to the CLASS so "included" or "enclosed" by the listing of the ITEMS listed.
  • The "CLASS" is defined by the ITEMS listed.
  • The expansion is ONLY ITEMS within the CLASS defined that are NOT listed.
  • The expansion does not include a different CLASS.
  • The expansion does not include items within a different CLASS.
 
  • The TERM (ingredients _for_ brownies) is defined to include things within "meaning of term (ingredients _for_ brownies) defined".
  • The TERM (ingredients _for_ brownies) is defined as to the CLASS (ingredients _of_ brownies) so "included" or "enclosed" by the listing of the ITEMS (eggs) listed.
  • The "CLASS" (ingredients _of_ brownies) is defined by the ITEMS (eggs) listed.
  • The expansion is ONLY ITEMS (flour, sugar, & chocolate) within the CLASS (ingredients _of_ brownies) defined that are NOT listed.
  • The expansion does not include a different CLASS (ingredients _of_ chili).
  • The expansion does NOT include ITEMS (beans & tomato sauce) of a different CLASS (ingredients _of_ chili).

  • The (ingredients _for_ brownies) is defined to include things within "the (ingredients _for_ brownies)".
  • The (ingredients _for_ brownies) is defined as to the (ingredients _of_ brownies) so "included" or "enclosed" by the listing of the (eggs).
  • The (ingredients _of_ brownies) is defined by the (eggs).
  • The expansion is ONLY ITEMS (flour, sugar, & chocolate) within the (ingredients _of_ brownies) defined that are NOT listed.
  • The expansion does not include a different CLASS (ingredients _of_ chili).
  • The expansion does NOT include ITEMS (beans & tomato sauce) of a different CLASS (ingredients _of_ chili).




Table of Contents